United States v. Donald E. Meadows
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, Circuit Judge:
Meadows was a CETA1 employee who, through an administrative error, received duplicate paychecks and cashed them until the mistake was discovered. He was convicted of “obtain[ing] by fraud” the duplicate paychecks in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 665. Because the district court improperly charged the jury in its definition of fraud as applied to the facts of the case, we reverse and remand for a new trial. Other issues raised in this appeal which may arise on retrial are also considered.
I. FACTS.
Meadows was indicted on one count of violating 18 U.S.C. § 665.2 The relevant *986facts…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Kentucky v. WhortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Weiss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Corcoran v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. James Hugh RogersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. MartinoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Gregory J. CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- State v. GanoHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- United States v. Grisel AriasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.