Legal Opinion

Clay v. U-Haul International Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 3, 2019No. 2:18-cv-01050Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION REBECCA CLAY, Case No. 2:18-cy-1050 Plaintiff, JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson v. U-HAUL COMPANY OF MASSACHUSETTS AND OHIO INC., Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant U-Haul Company of Massachusetts and Ohio Incorporated’s, (“Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 26). Plaintiff Rebecca Clay (“Plaintiff”) has responded (ECF No. 29) and Defendant has replied (ECF No. 30). Thus, the motion is ripe for review. For the reasons that follow,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Armstrong v. Best Buy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API