Legal Opinion
Doe v. Town of Framingham
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 4, 1997No. Civil Action 96-11267-GAOPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
O’TOOLE, District Judge.
Jane Doe brought this action to recover damages that she alleges the defendants caused by compelling her to place her son in a private school despite the Town of Framingham’s duty to provide him a free appropriate public education. In particular, Jane Doe alleges that the Town of Framingham denied her son a free appropriate public education (Counts I & II); committed educational malpractice (Count III); and wrongfully excluded him from the Framingham Public Schools in the Fall of 1994 (Counts IV through VII). The defendants have now moved for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Barbour v. Dynamics Research Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Laurice J. Ezratty v. The Commonwealth of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Kevin Ross v. Creighton UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Karl Pihl v. Massachusetts Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Padilla v. School District No. 1Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Taylor v. Altoona Area School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Pollard v. Georgetown School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Wright v. Capella Univ., Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
- In re: Suffolk University COVID Refund LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.