Legal Opinion

American Insurance v. Naylor

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 21, 1937No. 13,955PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bouck

The judgment we are asked to reverse was based upon fatal personal injuries resulting' from an automobile collision. The defendants are plaintiffs in error here.

The collision was between a car owned by the defendant American Insurance Company and driven by the defendant Reams, one of its agents, and a car driven by a relative of the plaintiff Naylor, now defendant in error. Plaintiff’s wife, riding in the Naylor car, sustained injuries, from which death resulted about three months later. Plaintiff recovered a $4,000 judgment on account of Ms wife’s death under Compiled Laws 1921, sections…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ward v. Teller Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  2. Freeman v. . DaltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. White v. Hurlbut Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1917

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Krueger v. ArySupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  2. Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc. v. Pete's Satire, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. Mile Hi Concrete, Inc. v. MatzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Bradley v. S. L. Savidge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. N.A.H. v. S.L.S.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API