Legal Opinion

Jones v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 28, 1988PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice:

This is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment by the Superior Court barring a wife from pursuing a claim for loss of consortium arising out of injuries sustained by her husband. The Superior Court ruled that wife’s claim was purely derivative of husband’s personal injury action and was subsequently foreclosed by a general release executed by the husband. We disagree and hold that although a cause of action for loss of consortium requires join-der with a spouse’s primary claim, the loss of consortium claim is not lost if the spouse asserting the primary claim precludes…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Whittlesey v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hopson v. St. Mary's HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Rosander v. Copco Steel & Engineering Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Yonner v. AdamsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
  5. Swartz v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Deuley v. DynCorp International, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  2. Kibble v. Weeks Dredging & Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. DeAngelis v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. Buckley v. National Freight, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. McCoy v. Colonial Baking Co. Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API