Legal Opinion

Estate of Hofford v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided January 8, 1945No. Docket No. 1845PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Black, Judge:

As set out in our opening statement, the principal issue left for our consideration is whether the transfers by the decedent of the capital stock of Hofford Co. and the purchase of the annuity contract for the benefit of his wife were transfers includible in the decedent’s gross estate under section 811 (c) of the Internal Revenue Code. The material provisions of this section are set forth in the margin.1 Under these provisions any transfer made by a decedent during his lifetime is includible in his gross estate if it falls within any one of the three classifications…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Hassett v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. May v. HeinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Colorado National Bank v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bixby v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  2. Koussevitsky v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
  3. Hofford v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
  4. Estate of George H. Burr, d'Assern v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
  5. Estate of Scofield v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API