Legal Opinion

Coal & Coke Ry. Co. v. Buckhannon River Coal & Coke Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1915PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Upshur County. Action by the Coal & Coke Railway Company against the Buckhannon River Coal & Coke Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, Judge:

This writ of error is to a judgment recovered against the Buckhannon River Coal '& Coke Company by the Coal & Coke Railway Company in an action of assumpsit for the freight on ten carloads of coal.

Defendant is a corporation engaged in mining coal and manufacturing coke. R. J. Humphreys, its general manager, sold the ten carloads of coal to Hite & Rafetto, of Fairmont, West Virginia, brokers, and, at their request, billed it to J. K. Dimmick & Co., Curtis Bay Piers, Maryland. The bills of lading contained the following ivritten words, “Freight Collect from J. K. Dimmick & Co.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland Flouring Mills Co. v. British & Foreign Marine Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
  2. Ryan v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Lewis v. Galena & Chicago Union RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Union Freight Railroad v. WinkleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  5. Strahorn v. Union Stock Yard & Transit Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad v. Warren Ross Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Ohio River Gravel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  3. Cleveland C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Western Maryland Railway Co. v. CrossWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API