Legal Opinion

Flanders v. Pueblo

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 21, 1945No. 15,407PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

These parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court. Plaintiffs in error, residents and taxpayers, acting for themselves and all others similarly situated, are hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs. The City of Pueblo and its officers are referred to as Pueblo. Certain of defendants in error, being those only who answered below, are referred to as the bondholders.

In October, 1938, Pueblo passed Ordinance No. 1373 providing for the issuance and payment of certain so-called refunding bonds. That ordinance is hereinafter referred to simply as 1373. Some of these bonds are held by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Montgomery v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Swisher v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  2. County of Maricopa v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  3. City of Boulder v. Public Service Company of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  4. Glenwood Post v. City of Glenwood SpringsColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Pueblo v. Grand Carniolian Slovenian Catholic Union of United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API