Legal Opinion

Dyer v. McKinley

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Broadfoot, .J.

The complaint filed contained an allegation that there was an agreement that claimant should be paid for such services from decedent’s estate and specifically by filing a claim therefor against said estate after the death of the mother. The trial court determined that this allegation, which was not contained in the claim as filed, constituted an amendment of the claim by which the claimant enlarged her demand and materially changed the nature of her action. The court cited a general rule that claims filed within the time limited therefor cannot be amended after the expiration of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leiser v. PagelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Estate of Von NobelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Longwell v. MierowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Boedecker v. Marine National Exchange BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. M & I Bank v. First American National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Reedsburg BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State Ex Rel. Clark v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of West Virginia, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Dyer v. ReynoldsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Reedsburg BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API