Le Vette v. Hardman Estate
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered December 13, 1912, dismissing an action by a tenant for injury to goods, on granting a non-suit.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
Appeal from an order of nonsuit and dismissal, in an action brought by a tenant to recover damages for injuries to her goods, caused by leakage of water from an *321upper story. The facts, so far as they are pertinent to our inquiry, are about these: The Hardman Estate is the owner of a building on Yesler Way, in Seattle, the lower portion of which is divided into storerooms, and the upper is used as a hotel. Appellant, who was engaged in the millinery business, occupied one of the storerooms under a written lease. Some time in August, 1911, the lessee of the hotel portion, although his lease had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Priest v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Randolph v. FeistAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898
- Levin v. HabichtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
- Rosenfield v. NewmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3Cited by15 opinions
- Crown Controls, Inc. v. SmileyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Cherberg v. Peoples National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Johnson v. Prange-Geussenhainer Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Meyer Jewelry Co. v. Professional Building Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Inglis v. GarlandAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.