Legal Opinion

Dale v. Fletcher

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided September 25, 2020No. 5:19-cv-03240Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS SEAN C. DALE, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 19-3240-SAC MARY FLETCHER, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9), Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint (ECF No. 18), and Defendants’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Response as to Motion to Amend Complaint (ECF No. 20). As the Court finds the case should be remanded to state court for lack of jurisdiction, all pending motions are denied as moot. I. Procedural…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Taylor v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. In Re Ben CarterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API