Legal Opinion

City of Kirkland v. O'Connor

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 6, 1985No. 13764-6-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorbett, C.J.

Kevin E. O'Connor seeks review of the decision affirming his conviction for driving while intoxicated. This court has accepted review pursuant to RAP 2.3(d). We reverse and remand for a new trial in district court.

O'Connor was convicted by a jury in Northeast District Court of driving while intoxicated. At the time of the arrest, O'Connor was not given a Breathalyzer test to determine the quantity of alcohol in his blood. The district court judge sua sponte instructed the jury:

You are not to draw any conclusions or inferences whatsoever from the absence of a breathalyzer test result in this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsenWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. BarringerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  3. State v. RothCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  4. State v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ZwickerWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. BermanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  3. Lasher v. University of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. Lasher v. University of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  5. Personal Restraint Petition Of: Carri Darlene WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API