Legal Opinion

Nevitt v. Woodburn

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1898PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Whiteside county; the Hon. John G. Gar ver, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Magruder

In this case a motion- is made to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction in this court. The appeal is taken directly from a decree entered by the circuit court; and it is claimed, that no freehold is involved, and that, therefore, the appeal should have been taken to the Appellate Court. We are of the opinion, that the bill filed in the court below was a bill filed against the trustee, and other parties acting for or with the trustee, for an accounting as to trust funds. The bill, being of the character thus indicated, involves no freehold; and the motion to dismiss must be allowed. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baker v. CopenbargerIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Glover v. CondellIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Matthiessen & Hegeler Zinc Co. v. City of La SalleIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Gage v. ScalesIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Woodburn v. WoodburnIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Klein v. Independent Brewing Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Lash v. LashIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Nevitt v. WoodburnIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. In re Lawrence's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  5. Kurzawski v. MalagaIllinois Supreme Court · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API