Legal Opinion

Labat v. Rayner

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided May 4, 2022No. 2:20-cv-00447Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA DENIRA M. LABAT, et al. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 20-447 SYDNEY M. RAYNER, et al. SECTION M (5) ORDER & REASONS Before the Court are three motions in limine filed by defendants Metropolitan Casualty Company, Sydney M. Rayner, and Michael Bell (collectively, “Defendants”).1 Plaintiff Denira Labat responds to each in opposition.2 Defendants reply in further support of their motions.3 Having considered the parties’ memoranda, the record, and the applicable law, the Court issues this Order & Reasons. I. Defendants’ Motion In Limine to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Moore v. Ashland Chemical Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  5. Jules R. Viterbo, Et Ux, (Patricia Viterbo) v. The Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API