Legal Opinion

Sakon v. Santini

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1932No. Docket No. 133, Calendar No. 35,522PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

Plaintiff, a resident of Arkansas, procured from defendant, Merchants .& Miners National Bank of Ironwood, several drafts payable to himself. In a gambling house at Hurley, Wisconsin, he indorsed and transferred them actually or in effect to the proprietor of the house, defendant Santini, and received therefor from Santini or his employee, defendant Masterson, cash and chips which he there lost in playing the game of craps against the house.

The drafts were negotiated further, and, the trial judge found correctly, are now held severally by defendants Johnson, Ironwood Auto Service Company, and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Vinton v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  2. New v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Cranson v. GossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  4. Union Trust Co. v. Preston National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Hall v. ParkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Modern Industrial Bank v. TaubSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
  2. Ritchie v. DrierCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  3. J G Wentworth Ssc Lp v. Anthony MorrisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. J G Wentworth Ssc Lp v. Anthony MorrisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API