Hall v. Parker
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Calhoun. Assumpsit on bonds for costs. The facts are in the ■opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
This action was brought on two bonds for costs. They were produced and filed respectively in separate cases iu the circuit court under orders there made in the same cases. Parker and Verplank were the defendants in each case; but in one Harvey B. Hall was plaintiff and in the other one Lewis Hall.
The bond in the c^se first named was given by plaintiffs in error, and it is not claimed to have been signed conditionally. In the second case, that in which Lewis Hall was plaintiff, the bond was written as one by Lewis Hall, Harvey B. Hall and S. H. Geiger to Parker and Verplank in the sum of $100…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boston Ice Co. v. PotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Pawling and Others v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1808
- Bean v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1822
- Vinton v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Adams v. GaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Gibbs & Sterrett Manufacturing Co. v. BruckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Belleville Savings Bank v. BornmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Johnston v. Township of KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Weinsklar Realty Co. v. DooleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Arnd v. SjoblomWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.