Legal Opinion

Vohs v. A. E. Shorthill Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 13, 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Marshall District Court.— Hon. G. W. Burn-ham, Judge. Action to recover for personal injuries received by plaintiff while an employe in defendant’s foundry and machine shop. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcClain, J.

The evidence tends to show the following facts: The plaintiff, without previous experience in working about a foundry or machine shop, or any place of a similar character, entered the employ of defendant, and was directed by the general manager, Speers, to put himself under the charge and direction of one Johnson, the superintendent of one branch of defendant’s business. Johnson kept plaintiff employed for four days in cutting rivets for the purpose of separating old bridge beams, and'then, on the representation of one Slingman, who had charge of the blacksmith shop, that a man was needed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mather v. RillstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Newbury ex rel. Newbury v. Getchel & Martin Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Sankey v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. Stomne v. Hanford Produce Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  5. McPherrin v. JenningsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. Sheffield Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. Louisa County National Bank v. BurrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  3. Cinkovitch v. Thistle Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. Harrison County v. State Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Glass Marine Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API