Legal Opinion

Pedro Rayo Zagal v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 24, 2019No. Court of Appeals Case 19A-PC-694PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Vaidik, Chief Judge.

Case Summary

[1] In 2007, Pedro Rayo Zagal pled guilty to possession of cocaine. More than ten years later, he filed a petition for post-conviction relief alleging that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him that his guilty plea carried a risk of *602 deportation, and the post-conviction court denied him relief. Because Rayo Zagal admitted that the advisements of rights at his initial hearing and in his plea agreement informed him that he could be deported as a result of his guilty plea and conviction and that he read these advisements, we affirm the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Segura v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Anthony Hollowell v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oscar Iraheta-Rosales v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API