Legal Opinion

Furey v. City of Sacramento

California Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1979No. S. F. 23967PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MANUEL, J.

— In these two cases, which have been consolidated for purposes of appeal, we face the question, among others, whether a city, having participated with other public entities in the creation of a special sewer assessment district in a county area intended for transition to urban development, and later having annexed the area, may thereafter amend its general plan and enact an open space ordinance in a manner precluding certain of the owners of property subject to assessment from realizing all or substantially all benefits from the underlying public improvement for an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Agins v. City of TiburonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Reichelderfer v. QuinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Knox v. City of OrlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Shea Homes Ltd. Partnership v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. In Re Jerald C.California Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Lawrence E. Furey, Trustee v. City of Sacramento, a Chartered City, County of Sacramento and Natomas Sanitation District of Sacramento CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API