Furey v. City of Sacramento
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MANUEL, J.
— In these two cases, which have been consolidated for purposes of appeal, we face the question, among others, whether a city, having participated with other public entities in the creation of a special sewer assessment district in a county area intended for transition to urban development, and later having annexed the area, may thereafter amend its general plan and enact an open space ordinance in a manner precluding certain of the owners of property subject to assessment from realizing all or substantially all benefits from the underlying public improvement for an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Agins v. City of TiburonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Reichelderfer v. QuinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Knox v. City of OrlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Shea Homes Ltd. Partnership v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- In Re Jerald C.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Lawrence E. Furey, Trustee v. City of Sacramento, a Chartered City, County of Sacramento and Natomas Sanitation District of Sacramento CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.