Legal Opinion

Milo L. Oliver v. Metro Transit, et al.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 4, 2026No. 3:25-cv-02932Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MILO L. OLIVER, Case No.: 25-cv-2932-AJB-VET 12 ORDER: Petitioner, 13 (1) DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO v. 14 PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS METRO TRANSIT, et al., (Doc. No. 4); 15 16 Respondents. (2) TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE 17 ENTERED METRO TRANSIT AND 18 ALPHA PROJECT; 19 (3) TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 20 DEFENDANT HUMANE SOCIETY SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR 21 FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 22 23 I. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 24 On October 27, 2025, Plaintiff Milo Oliver, a prisoner proceeding pro se,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Andrews v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Underhill v. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API