Legal Opinion

Mittelman v. Witous

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 18, 1988No. 86-1409PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman

Plaintiff, Robert Mittelman, appeals the circuit court of Cook County’s denial of his motion to vacate the dismissal of his first-amended complaint for slander per se, and intentional and willful interference with his “prospective business relationship and contractual expectancy” with the law firm of Clausen, Miller, Gorman, Caffrey, and Witous, P.C. (Clausen Miller), and for leave to file a second-amended complaint against defendants, John J. Witous and James T. Ferrini.

The following facts are taken from plaintiff’s first-amended complaint, the well-pleaded allegations of which were taken as…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Chapski v. Copley PressIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. BarthIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Catalano v. PechousIllinois Supreme Court · 1980

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mittelman v. WitousIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. TUNCA v. PainterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  3. Genelco, Inc. v. BowersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. Dawson v. New York Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  5. Clubs of California for Fair Competition v. KrogerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API