Legal Opinion

Saunders v. Alford

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1992No. 89-CA-185PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

607 So.2d 1214 (1992)

Charles David SAUNDERS

v.

Jeffy R. ALFORD.

No. 89-CA-185.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

October 8, 1992.

James H. Mathis, Mathis & Hill, Corinth, for appellant.

Charles M. Merkel, Jr., John H. Cocke, Merkel & Cocke, Clarksdale, for appellee.

En Banc.

BANKS, Justice, for the Court:

We are called upon to abolish the cause of action for criminal conversation. Finding that this cause of action has outlived its usefulness, we declare its demise and reverse and render the judgment entered against the appellant, Charles Saunders in favor of appellee and cross appellant, Jeffy Alford.

I

Jeffy…

Also in this document: Dissent · Lee; Dissent · Lee.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pruett v. City of RosedaleMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Munford, Inc. v. PetersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Overstreet v. MerlosMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Hunt v. HuntSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Moulin v. MonteleoneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. McCutchen v. McCutchenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. CHILDREN'S MEDICAL GROUP, PA v. PhillipsMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Fitch v. ValentineMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Paz v. Brush Engineered Materials, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Franklin Collection Service, Inc. v. KyleMississippi Supreme Court · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API