Ardelian v. Ford Motor Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdward M. Sharpe, J.
I am not in accord with the opinion of Mr. Justice Potter. This case is ruled by Hajduk v. Revere Copper & Brass, Inc., 268 Mich. 220. Both cases involved an eye injury; each employer was notified of the injury through his agent and employee; each of the injured employees continued in the employ of his employer after the injury; and in each case the employer failed to notify the department of labor and industry of the injury or demand for compensation; and further, no action was taken to gain compensation until more than 10 years after the date of the injury.
"We said in Hajduk v. Revere…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hajduk v. Revere Copper & Brass, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Cruse v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Gallup v. Western Board & Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by16 opinions
- Autio v. Proksch Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
- Tarnow v. Railway Express AgencyMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Henderson v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Duncan v. Gaffney Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
- Malleis v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.