Legal Opinion

Ardelian v. Ford Motor Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1935No. Docket No. 20, Calendar No. 38,225PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdward M. Sharpe, J.

I am not in accord with the opinion of Mr. Justice Potter. This case is ruled by Hajduk v. Revere Copper & Brass, Inc., 268 Mich. 220. Both cases involved an eye injury; each employer was notified of the injury through his agent and employee; each of the injured employees continued in the employ of his employer after the injury; and in each case the employer failed to notify the department of labor and industry of the injury or demand for compensation; and further, no action was taken to gain compensation until more than 10 years after the date of the injury.

"We said in Hajduk v. Revere…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hajduk v. Revere Copper & Brass, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Cruse v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  3. Gallup v. Western Board & Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Autio v. Proksch Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Tarnow v. Railway Express AgencyMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Henderson v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Duncan v. Gaffney Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  5. Malleis v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API