Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Gaynor
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 16, 2004No. 00CIV.9058(LTS)(GAY)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWAIN, District Judge.
Before the Court are the motions of Defendants Thomas Gaynor (“Gaynor”), Dennis Hardy (“Hardy”), and The Village of Piermont, New York (“the Village” or “Piermont”) for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Raymond Holmes, Jr. (“Plaintiff’ or “Holmes”), a former employee of the Village, asserts three causes of action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, all stemming from alleged violations of his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Plaintiff alleges that: 1) all Defendants…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- The Dartmouth Review, on Behalf of Its Officers, Staff and Subscribers v. Dartmouth CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Karpova v. SnowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Gallo v. Suffolk County Police DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Avalon Holdings Corporation v. GentileDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Samuel Kellner v. The City of New York and Patricia L. Hynes, Administrator of the Estate of Charles J. HynesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Yager v. County of ErieDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2025