State v. Short
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCave, J.
The defendants, -\yere convicted of, violating Sec. 3520, R. S. 1939, which declares certain, acts of certain vendors a misdemeanor. They have appealed.
The defendants challenged- the. sufficiency of the information by a motion to quash, which was ¡overruled,, and -this is the-only error .properly preserved. • •
Defendants do seek to urge error in State’s instructions''S-l and S-2, but we have carefully examined -the motion for new -trial and find no reference to said instructions or to any others given on behalf of the State and, under.'such circumstances, we .are precluded from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. NullSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- State v. InksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- State v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- State v. SargentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
- State v. LasswellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
- State v. FosterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980