Legal Opinion

State v. Short

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCave, J.

The defendants, -\yere convicted of, violating Sec. 3520, R. S. 1939, which declares certain, acts of certain vendors a misdemeanor. They have appealed.

The defendants challenged- the. sufficiency of the information by a motion to quash, which was ¡overruled,, and -this is the-only error .properly preserved. • •

Defendants do seek to urge error in State’s instructions''S-l and S-2, but we have carefully examined -the motion for new -trial and find no reference to said instructions or to any others given on behalf of the State and, under.'such circumstances, we .are precluded from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. NullSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  2. State v. InksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. State v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. State v. SargentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. State v. LasswellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. State v. FosterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API