Partridge v. Michigan Mutual Windstorm Insurance

Lest on this rehearing the exact point in the case and the facts surrounding it be overlooked, I again call attention to reasons for reversal.

Plaintiffs, upon becoming members of this mutual company, were charged with knowledge of two things: (1) They wpre bound by the provisions of its charter and by-laws; and (2) that this mutual company only had power to insure property “subject to the terms and conditions of the articles of as sociation and the by-laws of the company as they now exist cmd as they ma/y hereafter be amended.” The quoted provision was plainly printed in plaintiffs’ insurance…