Legal Opinion

Lund v. Kline

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 1937No. 2724PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By GIEGER, J.

The action below was one to recover damages for injuries received by the plaintiff in an automobile accident. The verdict of the jury was in favor of the plaintiff, in the sum of $2,700.00; such verdict being signed by ten members of the jury. A motion for a new trial was filed, and overruled.

The assignment of errors submitted by the defendant are:

1. The jury was guilty of misconduct, by which defendant was prevented from having a fair trial.

2. The verdict is illegal because it was a result of chance.

3. The verdict is contrary to law.

The assignments 4. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stadium Cab Co. v. ShawdOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bader v. CorbinOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. State ex rel. Hetzler v. SnyderPiqua Municipal Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API