Legal Opinion
State v. Vanosdol
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 18, 1998No. WD 55365PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAURA DENVIR STITH, Judge.
Mr. Vanosdol appeals his conviction of driving while intoxicated, alleging that there was insufficient evidence of intoxication to support the verdict. Finding that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, we affirm.
At approximately 8:15 p.m. on May 13, 1995, Officer Douglas Shoemaker saw Mr. Vanosdol and his girlfriend speeding in Mr. Vanosdol’s truck at 54 mph in a 40 mph zone. He followed the truck and saw it weave without signaling and turn without signaling. After the turn, the truck again sped up to 52 mph. At that point, the officer stopped the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. O'TooleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- State v. RuarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. SpainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. FisherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. McCartyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dixon v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. MATTHEW G. PILANTMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Lipp v. Ginger C, L.L.C.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2017
- State v. BurnsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012