Legal Opinion
Cornell University v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided March 30, 2009No. 01-CV-1974PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
RANDALL R. RADER, Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.
This court conducted an eight-day jury trial running May 19-30, 2008, to determine the validity and infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,807,115 (the '115 patent). Finding the '115 patent valid and infringed, the jury awarded damages of $184,044,048 to Cornell. The jury arrived at this award by applying a 0.8% royalty rate to a $23,005,506,034 royalty base, which included earnings from the sale of many components of Hewlett-Packard’s products that are not covered at all by…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Paper Converting MacHine Company v. Magna-Graphics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- State Industries, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Mor-Flo Industries, Inc. And American Appliance Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Brooktree Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Twm Manufacturing Co., Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellants v. Dura Corp. And Kidde, Inc., Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Laserdynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Virnetx, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Energy Transportation Group, Inc. v. William Demant Holding A/S, WDH Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Dataquill Ltd. v. High Tech Computer Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2011
- Fractus, S.A. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.