Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 2001No. B140274PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOLAND, J. *

Introduction

This case asks us to determine the contractual obligations of an excess insurer that has notice of competing claims that may exceed the policy limits of the excess insurance coverage. In that situation, the question is whether the excess insurer may pay full benefits to the first insured who has exhausted the limits of the primary insurance coverage, or whether the insurer has a duty to protect the interests of the other insured who has not exhausted the primary insurance and is not yet entitled to claim excess insurance benefits.

We conclude that an excess…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  2. Joan Cherie Amadeo v. Principal Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Allstate Ins. Co. v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Progressive West Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. EFG Bank AG v. AXA Equitable Life Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API