Legal Opinion

Sheffield Car Co. v. Buda Foundry & Mfg. Co.

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided March 24, 1910No. 29,187PublishedCited by 2 opinions

• In Equity. Suit by the Sheffield Car Company against the Buda Foundry & Manufacturing Company. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

KOHLSAAT, Circuit Judge.

Complainant files its bill to restrain infringement of claims 14, 16, 18, 20, 23, 24, 30, 32, 35, 36, 38, 39, and 41 of patent No. 876,058, granted to W. S. Hovey January 7, 1908, for improvements in railway motor velocipedes. The number and length of the claims preclude their being restated here. The patentee’s avowed object was to provide: (1) A compact, light weight, and strong motor velocipede. (2) One in which the engine of the explosive type may be readily started. (3) One which ma)>- be co¡ iccted up quickly for either manual or motor propulsion. (4) One in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wright v. YuenglingSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Allis v. StowellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1881

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boop v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1959
  2. Baltimore & O. R. v. Walter S. Newhall Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API