Legal Opinion

Mutaz Al-Shara v. People’s Republic of China

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 4, 2026No. 4:26-cv-11390Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MUTAZ AL-SHARA, Case No. 26-11390 Plaintiff, F. Kay Behm v. U.S. District Judge PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, Defendant. ___________________________ / ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF No. 2) AND DIMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (ECF No. 1) I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Mutaz Al-Shara filed a Complaint against Defendant People’s Republic of China on April 27, 2026, alleging various torts caused by unwanted telephone contact originating from China. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff also filed an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API