Legal Opinion

Kitselman v. Rautzahn

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1951No. 3605PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*344OPINION

By the Court,

Merrill, J.:

This is an appeal from order of the trial court denying motion for new trial. Suit was brought by the appellant as plaintiff to recover shares of stock representing ownership of the Pyramid Lake Ranch located in Washoe County, Nevada, and for an accounting of corporate profits realized from the operation of the ranch. The stock had been assigned by appellant to his sister, respondent Marjorie Rautzahn, and by her to the parties’ mother, respondent Figueroa. The interests of the remaining parties respondent do not concern us in this appeal.

Appellant contends…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sherman v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Smith v. GoodinNevada Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Jones v. West End Consolidated Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Lynde-Bowman-Darby Co. v. HuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shoshone Coca-Cola Bottling Company v. DolinskiNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Price v. SinnottNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Avery v. GilliamNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Carlson v. McCallNevada Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Seyden v. FradeNevada Supreme Court · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API