Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Gains

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1872Published

PROM WARREN. Appeal from the Chancery Court. B. N. Till-MAN, Chancellor. a

1Opinion of the CourtSneer, J.

The complainants are Thomas N. Frazier and Jas. H. Fulloss, and have brought their bill to be relieved from the payment of a note,' in the words and figures following':

“ Sixty days after' date, we, or either of us, promise to pay Gracy & Gains seven thousand two hundred and ninety-eight dollars and seventy-five cents in current bank notes, for a lot of bacon, for value re-*93ceiyed of them. Witness our hands and seals, this 10th of April, 1862.” T. C. Goff, [l. s.]

Isaac B. HeNSON, [l. s.]

J. A. Eulloss, Sec’y, [l. s.]

Thos. H. Eeazieb, Sec’y, [l. s.]

The complainants signed said note while the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goodman v. SimondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Violett v. PattonSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  3. Jennings v. KeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Hoyt v. SeeleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1847
  5. The Insurance Company of the Valley of Virginia, in Error v. Moses C. MordecaiSupreme Court of the United States · 1860

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API