Ferrari v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [33]
JUDITH E. LEVY, District Judge.
This is an employment discrimination case. Pending is defendant Ford Motor Company’s motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. 33.)
I. Background
Plaintiff has been an employee of Ford Motor Company since 1996, and a member of the United Auto Workers (“UAW”) for the duration of his employment. In 2000, while on the job, plaintiff suffered a neck injury that substantially limited him in a number of major life activities. He continued to work at Ford with accommodations that have varied based on the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Seeger v. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Lewis v. Humboldt Acquisition Corp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Deborah Audra Skousen v. Brighton High School, Paul Rambo, a Michigan State TrooperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Whitfield v. TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schindewolf v. City of BrightonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- Leppek v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021