Legal Opinion
Western Filter Corp. v. Argan, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 25, 2008No. 07-55535PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
Western Filter Corporation (“Western Filter”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Argan, Inc. (“Argan”). The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We are asked to decide an issue of first impression under California law, whether a provision within a Stock Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) permitting the representations and warranties of the parties to survive closing, also serves as a contractual statute of limitation that reduces a longer period otherwise provided by California…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hambrecht & Quist Venture Partners v. American Medical International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Moreno v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Denman Tire Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Hydro-Mill Co. v. Hayward, Tilton & Rolapp Insurance Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Soldano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Stearns v. Select Comfort Retail Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Zalkind v. Ceradyne, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Town of Crossville Housing Authority v. John A. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
- Ram's Gate Winery, LLC v. RocheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Residential Funding Co. v. HSBC Mortgage Corp. (USA) (In re Residential Capital, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.