Legal Opinion

Cox v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1994No. 19354PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Movant appeals from the demal of Ms motion for postconviction relief under Rule 24.035. The trial court made findings of fact, conclusions of law and demed the motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant had sought to vacate convictions for forcible rape and first degree robbery to wMch he had entered pleas of guilty and was sentenced to two concurrent terms of life imprisonment.

On appeal movant presents three points relied on. Appellate review is to determine whether the findings and conclusions of the trial court are clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(j). If a motion under Rule…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hagan v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. Thurlo v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. State v. ShieldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  5. Kinder v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
  2. State v. TownsendMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API