Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:
Keystone, the taxpayer, transferred property to its tax qualified defined benefit pension plan in satisfaction of its statutory minimum funding requirements. The Commissioner asserted that this transfer of property in satisfaction of an obligation was a sale or exchange within the meaning of Section 4975(c)(1)(A), and therefore asserted tax deficiencies under Section 4975(a) and (b).
Keystone filed suit in the tax court, contending that it was not liable for the deficiencies. The tax court granted summary judgment in favor of Keystone, holding that neither the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Helvering v. HammelSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- In the Matter of Unified Control Systems, Inc., Bankrupt. James S. Mahon, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. United States Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Wood v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1990
- Earl M. Latterman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commissioner v. Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dallas C. Wood v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Barker v. Pick N Pull Auto Dismantlers, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1993
- Commissioner v. Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Commissioner v. Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.