Legal Opinion

Sanford v. Weeks

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

M'ror from Wabaunsee District Court. Action by Weeks and another against Sanford, to declare plaintiffs to be the owners of a certain tract of land, and to quiet their title thereto. Judgment for the plaintiffs, at the May term, 1891. The defendant comes to this court. The opinion states the facts of this case—No. 8218.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

On August 1, 1885, Henry M. Weeks and Joel P. Weeks recovered a judgment against E. H. Sanford, *340decreeing that the Weekses were the owners of a certain tract of land, and quieting their title to the same as against Sanford. The cause was removed to the supreme court, and that judgment was affirmed in January, 1888. (Sanford v. Weeks, 38 Kas. 319.) A motion for a rehearing was filed in the supreme court, and was overruled by that court at its session in July, 1888. (Sanford v. Weeks, 39 Kas. 649.) Several motions and applications have since…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. Mulvaney v. LovejoySupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  3. Sanford v. WeeksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. Sanford v. WeeksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blair v. BlairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Bellamy v. Washita Valley Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. MosherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. State v. SoffiettiSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Feighley v. C. Hoffman & Son Milling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API