Legal Opinion

French v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 15, 1934No. 2965PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

The record contains no statement of facts. Briefs have not been filed by plaintiff in error. Defendant in error has filed brief and orally argued the case upon submission. In the absence of brief by plaintiff in error we are limited to the consideration of fundamental errors, if any.

The suit was filed June 28, 1932, by defendant in error, Hill, against the plaintiff in error, French. The parties will be designated as they were in the trial court. The suit was to recover the sum of $1,000 alleged to be a reasonable attorney’s fee for legal services rendered by plaintiff to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yeaman v. Galveston City CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Cavitt v. AmslerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Arnold v. PennCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  4. Clements v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McCorkle v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. West Texas Utilities Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Norton v. Commerce Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  4. Sinclair-Prairie Oil Co. v. BeadleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Kennedy v. Texas Employers Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API