Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Henderson & Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1891PublishedCited by 9 opinions

PROM WASHINGTON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Washington County. A. J. BrowN, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

This is a suit by subcontractors. ' and material-men, under Chapter 103, Acts of 1889.

In September, 1890, Carroll & - Co., contractors and builders, undertook, by special contract with W. R. Reeves, the plaintiff in error, to construct a house on a lot owned by him and another in Johnson City, Tennessee.

Henderson & Co., the defendants in error, by •contract with Carroll & Co., and without contract with Reeves, furnished the materials and did the tin-work on the house. Completing their work on November 19, 1890, Henderson & Co., on the twenty-first of the same month, gave Reeves written notice…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Central Trust Co. v. CondonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  2. Sequatchie Concrete Service, Inc. v. Cutter LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  3. Cole Manufacturing Co. v. FallsTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Bassett v. BertorelliTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Chattanooga Lumber & Coal Corp. v. PhillipsTennessee Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API