Legal Opinion

Commonwealth ex rel. Truscott v. Binenstock

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1951No. Appeal, No. 210PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

This appeal by the defendant is from a judgment awarding certain moneys in his hands to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania by escheat. The money has been involved in several appeals to this court and much of the appellant’s present argument has been decided adversely to him. Prom the Tucker v. Binenstock litigation (310 Pa. 254, 165 A. 247 — a proceeding in equity for an accounting), “it was clear [as we later express*521ly recognized in Commonwealth, by Truscott et al. v. Binenstock, 358 Pa. 644, 646, 57 A. 2d 884] that Binenstock bad received money to wliicli he was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reamer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Tucker v. BinenstockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Creachen v. Bromley Bros. Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Truscott v. BinenstockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Allen v. PennypackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Makransky v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  2. Binenstock TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Jackson v. HendrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Bonfitto v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Binenstock TrustPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API