Legal Opinion

Blackhawk v. City of Chubbuck

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided November 24, 2006No. CV-04-629-E-BLWPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

WINMILL, Chief Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The Court has before it Defendants’ Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 117). The Court heard oral argument on September 29, 2006. Thereafter, the parties filed supplemental briefs. The Court now issues the following decision.

ANALYSIS

I. State Law Claims

Defendants assert that they are immune from Plaintiffs’ state law claims based on Idaho Code §§ 6-610, 6-904A, and 6-904(3).

A. I.C. § 6-610

Defendants argue that Plaintiffs’ state law claims are precluded because Plaintiffs failed to post the bond required by Idaho Code §…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Gibson v. County of Washoe, NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of Robert Thomas Sequints v. Rivera, Jr.District Court, D. Idaho · 2025
  2. Mattson v. IDHWIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Trappett v. Clearwater CountyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API