Blackhawk v. City of Chubbuck
District Court, D. Idaho
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
WINMILL, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The Court has before it Defendants’ Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 117). The Court heard oral argument on September 29, 2006. Thereafter, the parties filed supplemental briefs. The Court now issues the following decision.
ANALYSIS
I. State Law Claims
Defendants assert that they are immune from Plaintiffs’ state law claims based on Idaho Code §§ 6-610, 6-904A, and 6-904(3).
A. I.C. § 6-610
Defendants argue that Plaintiffs’ state law claims are precluded because Plaintiffs failed to post the bond required by Idaho Code §…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gibson v. County of Washoe, NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of Robert Thomas Sequints v. Rivera, Jr.District Court, D. Idaho · 2025
- Mattson v. IDHWIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
- Trappett v. Clearwater CountyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2023