Legal Opinion

Miller v. Crown Perfumery Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1908PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action for conspiracy to deprive plaintiff, a stockholder in the defendant company, from participation in the profits, with a prayer for equitable relief. ' The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtLeventritt, J.

Charging a conspiracy on the part of the individual defendants to deprive him of participation in the profits of the defendant company, the plaintiff brings this action, basing his right to equitable intervention and relief upon allegations that he and the individual defendants were entitled to an equal division of the net profits realized from the business of that company; that such a division had been made from the inception and formation of the company in 1900 down to and. including the year-1905, hut that the de*385fendants Batcheller and Russell, in January, 1906, combined their votes to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Duncomb v. . N.Y., H. N.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Jacobson v. . Brooklyn Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co. v. KneelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Beers v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Bassett v. FairchildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carr v. KimballAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. Buchman v. American Foam Rubber CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  3. Godley v. Crandall & Godley Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  4. Miller v. Crown Perfumery Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  5. Wellington Bull & Co. v. MorrisNew York Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API