Legal Opinion

Beers v. New York Life Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1892PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Case submitted on agreed statement. Action by William H. Beers against the Hew Tork Life Insurance Company to recover the first quarterly payment of a salary agreed to be paid him under a contract executed by certain officers of defendant company at the direction of its board of trustees. Judgment for defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

The question in difference is stated in the agreed case to be: “Is the said Beers entitled to be paid, and to recover from, and have judgment against, the defendant, the New York Life Insurance Company, in the sum of $9,375, being the first quarterly payment upon and under an agreement executed by the said Beers on his own behalf and by A. H. Welsh, second vice president, and R. W. Weeks, actuary, of said life insurance company, on behalf and under the seal of, and by authority of, the board of trustees of said company, on February 8, 1892?” The power of the court to decide this question…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gamble v. Queens County Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Van Cott v. . Van BruntNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Osborne v. Locke Steel Chain Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  2. Carney v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Jacobson v. . Brooklyn Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  5. Howard Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Company (A Delaware Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API