Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Paine, Webber & Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 1, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

The defendants were stockbrokers conducting business in Hartford, and early in 1929, the plaintiff opened an account with them for the purpose of trading in stocks at which time he introduced to them his business associate, Steinberg, as his agent and representative, expressly stating to them that he was authorized to trade with the defendants for and on the plaintiff’s account. For about ten months thereafter and up to November 21st, 1929, Steinberg did most of the trading for the account of the plaintiff, and. some of the stocks so bought were delivered to Steinberg who receipted for them…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grant v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  2. Rindge v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. Verzier v. ConvardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
  4. Harmonie Club, Inc. v. SmirnowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  5. Van Epps v. RedfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API