Hartford Live Stock Insurance v. Everett
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLockyear, J.
The appellees were the owners of a race horse named “Asaph,” the life of which horse the appellants insured under a policy which contained the following stipulation: “Nor shall this company be liable for the death of any animal which shall have been subject to an operation of any kind during the life of this policy without the written consent of the company for such operation to be performed endorsed thereon or attached hereto and signed by its General Agent at Hartford, Connecticut.”
Without obtaining the consent of the company, the appellees, as is often done with race horses, had one of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Ferguson v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Girard Life Insurance, Annuity & Trust Co. v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
- Hull v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Union Life Insurance v. JamesonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- O'MEARA v. American States Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Garvin Street Warehouse, LLC v. Ascot Specialty Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2026