Legal Opinion
Stephan Namisnak v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 24, 2020No. 18-15860PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEPHAN NAMISNAK; FRANCIS No. 18-15860 FALLS, Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-06124- v. RS UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; RASIER, LLC, OPINION Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Richard Seeborg, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 14, 2020 San Francisco, California Filed August 24, 2020 Before: J. Clifford Wallace and Ryan D. Nelson, Circuit Judges, and Frederic Block, * District Judge. Opinion by Judge R. Nelson * The Honorable Frederic…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- George Jones v. L.A. Central Plaza, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Bruce Ellison v. American Board of OrthopaedicCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Isabelle Franklin v. Cmty. Regl Med. Ctr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Paul O'Hanlon v. Uber Technologies IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Rachael Winsor v. Sequoia Benefits & InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.