Legal Opinion

Rachael Winsor v. Sequoia Benefits & Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 8, 2023No. 21-16992PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RACHAEL WRIGHT WINSOR, No. 21-16992 individually and on behalf of the RingCentral, Inc. Welfare Benefits D.C. No. 3:21-cv- Plan, and on behalf of similarly 00227-JSC situated persons; NICOLE BEICHLE, individually and on behalf of the RingCentral, Inc. Welfare Benefits OPINION Plan, and on behalf of similarly situated person, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SEQUOIA BENEFITS & INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC; GREGORY S. GOLUB, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. George Jones v. L.A. Central Plaza, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  2. Marla Knudsen v. MetLife Group IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
  3. Cevasco v. Allegiant Travel CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
  4. Chea v. Lite Star ESOP CommitteeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. Goodsell v. Teachers Health TrustDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API