Legal Opinion

Lomasney v. Prendible

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 1, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an appeal from a decree entered in a probate court upon a petition in equity brought to compel the payment of an annuity alleged to be due under a will and a compromise agreement. Martin M. Lomasney died testate on August 12, 1933. His will and an agreement to compromise a contest of that will were allowed by the appropriate probate court on January 22, 1936. The respondent Prendible, hereafter called the respondent, was appointed executor of the will and has duly qualified as such. By his will the testator left the residue of his estate to the respondent in trust to continue during…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Towle v. SwaseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Cummings v. CummingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Parkhurst v. GinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Ellis v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Smith v. FellowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bolster v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Sanford v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Ross v. FriedmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  4. Silverman v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Manganiello v. CaggianoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API